duesberg hypothesis造句

• User : BruceSwanson / combining duesberg hypothesis Inventing fails to do that.
• And the Duesberg hypothesis is bullshit.
• Look at the current leads to Satanic ritual abuse, Duesberg hypothesis, and " Inventing the AIDS virus ".
• The website has repeatedly published articles promoting the Duesberg hypothesis ( and indeed hosted conferences on AIDS where Duesberg presented his views ) that HIV is a harmless passenger virus and does not cause AIDS; we have RS documenting LRC's promotion of these views.
• Hence, we have articles like AIDS reappraisal, Duesberg hypothesis, etc . If we adhered to a scientific point of view, it would be inappropriate to mention AIDS denialism in the AIDS article, or to bother to cover it at all, as it has no scientific credibility.
• I made a minor edit to Duesberg Hypothesis, in which I added Professor Kary Mullis as a supporter of Professor Duesberg ( he wrote a forward to Duesberg's book ) and qualified a statement stating that the scientiflic community rejected Duesberg's views on HIV, to say instead that a " majority " of the scientific community rejected them.
• In his 1996 book " Inventing the AIDS Virus " and in numerous journal articles and letters to the editor, Duesberg asserts that HIV is harmless and that recreational and pharmaceutical drug use, especially of zidovudine ( AZT, a drug used in the treatment of AIDS ) are the causes of AIDS outside Africa ( the so-called Duesberg hypothesis ).
• The current lead to Inventing the AIDS Virus contains a propagandistic interjection unworthy of Wikipedia ( " The scientific evidence is conclusive that this theory, known as the " Duesberg hypothesis ", is incorrect and it is the unambiguous scientific consensus that HIV is in fact the cause of AIDS . " ) . "'That is baldfaced POVing and a baldfaced lie "'--the consensus is anything but " unambiguous "-- there are many Root-Bernstein's out there with many degrees of agreement and disagreement with the HIV = AIDS hypothesis.